Explore projects

In this task participants are required to sort the presented cards based on a rule. The rule is unknown to the participants, however they receive feedback whether their answer was correct. The rule changes after certain amount of trials. This experiment is based on Grant & Berg (1948) experiment.

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

Sustained Attention to Response Time Task (SART)

This SART task is modeled on the framework used in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Participants must press a button (mouse or onscreen) in response to a series of digits and withold responses on the number 3)

Each digit appears for 300ms, with an interval of 800ms between digits. The cycle of digits 1–9 is repeated 23 times, giving a total of 207 trials. The task lasts approximately for 4min

Citations

Robertson I. H. Manly T. Andrade J. Baddeley B. T. Yiend J . (1997). ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758. doi:S0028-3932(97)00015-8 [pii]

Aisling M. O’Halloran, Ciaran Finucane, George M. Savva, Ian H. Robertson, Rose Anne Kenny, Sustained Attention and Frailty in the Older Adult Population, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Volume 69, Issue 2, March 2014, Pages 147–156, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt009

A basic demo of a go no-go task.

The Choice Reaction Time Task (Deary & Liewald, 2011)

Sustained Attention to Response Time Task (SART)

This SART task is modeled on the framework used in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Participants must press a button (mouse or onscreen) in response to a series of digits and withold responses on the number 3)

Each digit appears for 300ms, with an interval of 800ms between digits. The cycle of digits 1–9 is repeated 23 times, giving a total of 207 trials. The task lasts approximately for 4min

Citations

Robertson I. H. Manly T. Andrade J. Baddeley B. T. Yiend J . (1997). ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758. doi:S0028-3932(97)00015-8 [pii]

Aisling M. O’Halloran, Ciaran Finucane, George M. Savva, Ian H. Robertson, Rose Anne Kenny, Sustained Attention and Frailty in the Older Adult Population, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Volume 69, Issue 2, March 2014, Pages 147–156, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt009

This experiment is designed to measure participants' forwards, backwards, and sequential digit spans. It uses visual presentation. Sequence length increases every two trials. If participants make an error on both trials of the same length, they move onto the next trial.

Should be OG— re-uploading because never appeared on dashboard

The classic Stroop task.

Sustained Attention to Response Time Task (SART)

This SART task is modeled on the framework used in The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)

Participants must press a button (mouse or onscreen) in response to a series of digits and withold responses on the number 3)

Each digit appears for 300ms, with an interval of 800ms between digits. The cycle of digits 1–9 is repeated 23 times, giving a total of 207 trials. The task lasts approximately for 4min

Citations

Robertson I. H. Manly T. Andrade J. Baddeley B. T. Yiend J . (1997). ‘Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758. doi:S0028-3932(97)00015-8 [pii]

Aisling M. O’Halloran, Ciaran Finucane, George M. Savva, Ian H. Robertson, Rose Anne Kenny, Sustained Attention and Frailty in the Older Adult Population, The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, Volume 69, Issue 2, March 2014, Pages 147–156, https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt009

IAT Project for PSY 458 The project is split into two experiments: part 1 and part 2 After completing this one, please search for the final part Thank you for your participation!

Test PsychoPy online

The aim of this study is to determine whether likeability ratings of novel food images will decrease after these images are paired together with obese, normal, thin body shapes. If you participate, you will be asked to rate a number of novel food stimuli on how much you think you would like them on a Likert scale from -100 (extremely dislike) to +100 (extremely like). You will then be shown these novel food items again, but each one will also be immediately be followed by an image of different body types (obese, normal, thin). An extinction phase will also be conducted where certain food and body image pairings will not be shown, and the food image will be shown without a body image being shown immediately after. Following these conditioning and extinction phases, you will then be asked to rate both the novel food images and body images using the same Likert scale which will show if your likeability rates differ after viewing the food images being paired with different body types.

Demo for using Mouseview.JS for web based eye tracking using the mouse.

When using this package please cite: Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Armstrong, T., & Dalmaijer, E. S. (2021, March 7). MouseView.js: Reliable and valid attention tracking in web-based experiments using a cursor-directed aperture. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rsdwg

A very simple Stroop Test for practice

A very simple CPT vigilance task, that is set to 10% occurence of the target

A forward and Backward Digit Span test for Working Memory The test adapts to participnts' answers and a score is calculated following Woods et al. (2012)

A forward and Backward Digit Span test for Working Memory The test adapts to participnts' answers and a score is calculated following Woods et al. (2012)