Explore projects

Numerosity Comparison task | G&R paradigm

Version for 6-7-years-old children

N tot trials = 48

Numerosity range: 10 to 40 dots Numerosity ratio: 1.20, 1.25, 1.50, 2.00 12 trials per ratio

NOTE: selected 24 pairs x 2 positions Correct Answer (left|right)

Visual cues manipulation: Fully Congruent | Fully Incongruent

Stimuli on the screen till resp is given 1s ITI

Key responses: 'f' and 'j' (for left and right respectively)

arrow simon task with punishments instead of rewards

The Posner spatial cueing paradigm.

OfficialSite@>> https://sefaly-buy.com/pro-burn-keto-gummies/ Facebook@>> https://www.facebook.com/ProBurnKetoGummiesUS Facebook@>> https://www.facebook.com/ProBurnKetoGummiesReview JimdoSite@>> https://pro-burn-keto-gummies-review.jimdosite.com/

In this study you will become familiar with a few pictures of faces and do a short change detection task comprising a flicker paradigm. After signing up, you will receive an email with a link to the task. IMPORTANT:

This study cannot be done on a tablet or phone, as you will need to use a keyboard. Please use a computer to participate. If you have Autism Spectrum Disorder or any disorder that affects your face perception, you will not be able to participate.

Created for Eliza Yujun Ng December 2018

Numbers are presented at a rate of one per second. The first digit cannot be 0 Following digits can be 0 but cannot be the same as the previous digit.

If the answer is correct the span is increased for the next trial If the answer is wrong the span is decreased for the next trial

If there are at least two errors at a given span and that represents more than half of the total attempts at that span then the experiment ends, returning a span of one less than the final span attempted.

In this experiment participants are required to respond whenever the stimulus (square) location matches its location the previous trial (N-back-1). N-back-2 trials involve responding whenever the location of the square is the same as its location 2 trials before. This task is based on Kirchner (1958) experiment.

GFMT (Burton et al 2010) is a face perception task to test the ability to tell two faces are the same person

Modern Emotion Recognition Test [MERT]: examines facial emotion recognition using 60 items of the six basic emotions anger, disgust, dear, happiness, sadness, and surprise. Developed by NF, Megan Barnett, Prof Lucia Valmaggia, and Prof Robin Morris.

✅Ergänzungsübersicht ➫ Diaetolin Kapseln

✅Kategorie ➫ Gewichtsverlust

✅Besuchen Sie die offizielle Website ➫ Klicken Sie hier, um zu bestellen

✅Nebenwirkungen ➫ Keine Nebenwirkungen hier

✅Vorsicht ➫ Nicht für Schwangere und Kinder

✅Erzielte Vor

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

Use the mouse to control what part of an image you can see. This demo shows you how easy it is to build rich dynamic studies using only the Builder view.

A demo based on the Corsi blocks task. Tests Spatial memory. Participants must remember the order in which a series of blocks change colour.

Created for Eliza Yujun Ng December 2018

Numbers are presented at a rate of one per second. The first digit cannot be 0 Following digits can be 0 but cannot be the same as the previous digit.

If the answer is correct the span is increased for the next trial If the answer is wrong the span is decreased for the next trial

If there are at least two errors at a given span and that represents more than half of the total attempts at that span then the experiment ends, returning a span of one less than the final span attempted.

German version of moral sentiment and action tendencies task, based on Antidepressant Advisor Study version but with addition of anger / punishing oneself.

In this task participants are tested on their iconic memory. Eight random letters (D, F, J, K) are presented in a circle for 100 ms and an arrow points to a letter participants are meant to memorise. This experiment is based on Lu et al. (2005) experiment.

This demo shows how one can use a code component to collect the pressure property of pointer events in JavaScript.

Because the default PsychoJS implementation of mouse events does not collect the pressure property of pointer events, we add two new event listeners to collect the pressure when the pointer first touches the tablet (pointerdown event) and also updates the property while the pointer moves across the tablet (pointermove event).

To try this demo, run it and touch the tablet screen with a pressure sensitive pointer (pen).

In this task participants are tested on their creativity. Participants are required to write down word associate of three different words presented on the screen. This experiment is based on Mednick (1962) experiment.